In Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics, the basic theory
around the comic/graphic novel is addressed. We are able to see, read, and
understand the comic in a larger context while also examining the process that
goes into its creation. One idea presented in Understanding Comics that was especially prevalent in Art
Spiegelman’s Maus was the disparity
between realism and cartoon style illustration. The choice of cartoon animation
in Maus served as an effective tool
to evoke emotion from the reader on many levels. The choice to use animals as a
character symbol brings countless other thoughts and opinions that the reader
now has to consider. We also are able to get these character’s through the
context of their dress. For example, old
Vladek looks much the same as young Vladek, save a pair of glasses and a
flannel shirt. These details, while seemingly small, convey the message that
years have passed and that old Vladek is no longer a Rudolph Valentino type.
Another very effective outcome of
the choice to use cartoon style animals in the place of realistic humans is the
surprising connection created between the reader and the subject matter.
Choosing to create a story around this period of time was a bold one. Often
times, an audience can become so inundated with the facts and figures
surrounding Hitler’s rise to power, the cultural and religious genocide, and
the spark of World War II that all humanity is torn from the subject. When we
are taught about this time period, or when visiting monuments and archives
dedicated to those lost and those who survived, one is to be reverent. The
problem is that reverence doesn’t necessarily evoke the type of thoughtfulness needed
to truly relate to a piece. Spiegelman
states that “When we abstract an image through cartooning, we’re not so much
eliminating details as we are focusing on specific details. By stripping down
an image to its essential ‘meaning’, an artist can amplify that meaning in a
way that realistic art can’t” (30). This concept is easily applied to Maus by the animal representation of each group within the story. We see both the authority figures and non-Jewish Polish citizens
represented by a pig. This is compared to the Jewish mouse, and the Anti-Semitic
cat. While these details seemingly take away from the humanity of the piece,
they actually allow the reader to shed pre-conceived notions in regards to this
time. Through this shedding, the story becomes new, emotionally relatable, and
artistic. The simplicity of the illustration allows the reader to take in the concept in its entirety from a humanistic approach, rather than a historical study.